People keep yelling left and right that this was unfair and that the jurors were unfair... blah, blah, blah!
Hellooooooo!
There was enough reasonable doubt thrown up in the air to force the jury into a "no guilty" verdict. IT'S THE LAW. They CANNOT convict if there is REASONABLE DOUBT.
The ONLY thing that I CANNOT understand at all, is why she was not convicted on the count of aggravated child abuse.
I don't think that there was ENOUGH reasonable doubt on that one, being that she failed to report her child missing after 30 days!
That, without a doubt, is NEGLECT!
She should've at least been convicted for that.
Should Casey Anthony have been convicted of murder?
If you follow the Bible, no.
Numbers 35:30 and Deuteronomy 19:15 are clear.
A minimum of two, and preferably three witnesses are required for conviction, especially in capital cases. When people think they "get away" with something like this, God has the final say. This is what "Vengeance is mine, says the LORD" means!
I have a feeling deep in my spirit that there is more to that family than meets the eye... especially when it comes to George Anthony.
G-d being the fair G-d that He is... will bring ALL things to light in His perfect time.
